We should then be able to use these releases and start a 2.0.0? Any blockers? If noone shouts I'll try to start working on it this week end
Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> Date: 2014-09-22 11:17 GMT+02:00 Subject: Re: [VOTE] a few geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts (take2) To: "d...@geronimo.apache.org" <d...@geronimo.apache.org> The VOTE passes with 3 +1: David, Romain, Me Will propagate the artifacts. txs and LieGrue, strub > On Monday, 22 September 2014, 8:12, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > +1 > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Sep 17, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Here comes the release train again after fixing the build and a few missing > licenses... >> >> * geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec >> * geronimo-jcdi_1.1_spec >> * geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec >> * geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec >> * geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec/ >> * geronimo-validation_1.1_spec/ >> * geronimo-json-1.0_spec >> >> Here is the staging repo >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1006/ >> >> I bet you will find the source.jars yourself ;) >> >> >> >> >> My key can be found at >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS >> >> >> please VOTE >> [+1] all fine, ship it >> [+0] meh, don't care >> [-1] stop, because ${reason} >> >> >> >> here is my +1 >> >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
