We can migrate to git whenever we want. It's just another infra ticket. Well, we should vote on it first I suppose.
Gary <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> </div><div>Date:11/27/2014 05:08 (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: dev@commons.apache.org </div><div>Cc: </div><div>Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons CSV 1.1 Released </div><div> </div>Le 27/11/2014 08:45, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > I agree with sebb. There has been a convention for naming tags in CSV (I > adopted the naming schema from [lang] when I released CSV 1.0). I cannot > remember that we've discussed changing the schema, so please stick to it. The naming scheme for [lang] was inherited from CVS and required a prefix with the name of the component to distinguish between the different components (CVS tags applied to the whole repository if I remember well). Nowadays I tend to prefer tags with the version number only. However since CSV 1.0 used the old convention I think it's preferable to keep it for the consistency. We'll be able to revert to version only tags after the migration to Git... someday :) Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
