On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:23:06 -0800, Ajo Fod wrote:
Can you explain what specifically breaks binary compatibility that doesn't
happen in other patches?

... and is there a test for this breakage?

Well, I'm not sure; it's just a guess from the reason given for
postponing to 4.0.
If you want the feature to be added earlier, you can check that
it's actually compatible, by running "mvn site" and checking the
"clirr" report.

[Then, there will also be the discussion about the name which
should be brought up here for a final decision.]

Regards,
Gilles


-Ajo.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Ajo Fod <ajo....@gmail.com> wrote:

Ah, thanks.

-Ajo.

On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:

On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 08:57:05 -0800, Ajo Fod wrote:

Guess we pushed this to 4.0 not 3.4
... but just in case its time.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1016

-Ajo


IIUC correctly, the change which you proposed there cannot be
considered for a minor release since it would break binary
compatibility.

Gilles



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to