The NOTICE file at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/NOTICE.txt
looks wrong just by the fact that it points to another non-existent file: This product includes software developed at Xerox Corporation. See the LICENSE.xerox file. There is no LICENSE.xerox in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/ Whether or not Xerox is a correct mention IDK. Gary On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > They are not, at least what you noted is not blocking and now clean up for > futures releases > Le 29 janv. 2015 00:45, "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > On 28 January 2015 at 20:46, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Build takes ~15mn on my computer but my hard drive is slow (compared > > > to a mac I'm at least twice slower cause of it). > > > > > > BTW I'll remove aspectj dir on trunk. > > > > > > About Java 8: while it is javadoc only I think we don't care - in > > > particular since we can't release building with a java 8 JVM while we > > > don't target java 8. > > > > > > About beta: it is a beta and not a RC. Not sure binary constraint > > > exists here as strictly as this but anyway I dont expect much API > > > changes now, mainly impl ones. > > > > > > I don't have time to re create a release (in general I need to build > > > at least 3 times cause of timing tests and my slow environment so it > > > globally takes at least 1h to only publish binaries on nexus). If > > > anyone takes the responsability to do it once aspectj/license stuff is > > > fixed I'll cancel this one otherwise I'll keep it open since nothing > > > until now prevents it to be released and we already lost a lot of time > > > > You keep asserting that there is nothing preventing the release. > > However this is not the case, because the NOTICE and perhaps LICENSE > > files are wrong. > > > > Since this was already brought up in the take 2 vote I think it's not > > right to continue with the release. > > > > > > > IMHO. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > @rmannibucau > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > > > 2015-01-28 21:28 GMT+01:00 Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org>: > > >> On 28.01.15 20:39, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > >>> Hello Romain, > > >>> > > >>> I've looked at the RC. > > >>> > > >>> - Signs and hashes are good > > >>> - builds find with maven 3.2.5 and Java 6 and 7, although the build > of > > the > > >>> core takes forever... The build fails with Java 8 (I've run mvn clean > > >>> verify). It looks like it's trying to create the JavaDocs but that > > fails > > >>> because of doclint. Building with Java 8 should work IMHO. > > >> > > >> The build should take somewhere between 2 and 4 minutes including all > > >> tests. What environment do you have? > > >> > > >> Bye, Thomas. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
