I'm all for RERO if the release manager is willing. Gary
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:37 PM, ianmca86 <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > no one has really answered ben's question yet. if bcel 209 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-209> is committed could we > cut > a release? it seems like everyone is okay with the general approach taken > there > > my company also is mandating all projects move to java 8 this month since > java 7 is discontinued next month. i'm quite nervous that patch has been > outstanding for a month already and we're blocking on it. nine years is too > long between releases and we don't need to drag this out more > > regards > ian > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-BCEL-6-0-based-on-RC3-tp4667129p4673380.html > Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
