based on what i understand from this discussion i did some changes, pls see https://github.com/salyh/commons-lang/commit/12edd41ec7563368b03fa540af5c9a127bbfd89d for the diff and https://github.com/salyh/commons-lang/blob/12edd41ec7563368b03fa540af5c9a127bbfd89d/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/ThreadUtils.java for the class in its current version.
Thanks Hendrik On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Peter Ansell <ansell.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 April 2015 at 19:21, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: >> 2015-04-13 2:27 GMT+02:00 Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>: >> >>> +1 to what Peter said: it's a functional interface so it is >>> lambda-compatible anyway. >>> >> >> Well, yes it would be a functional interface, but it would lack all the >> default methods defined in java.util.function.Predicate if we don't extend >> it later. > > Agreed, I was trying to get that point across with my last comment: > >>> > > public interface ThreadPredicate extends >>> > java.util.function.Predicate<Thread> >>> > >>> > This change is useful once JDK-8 is the baseline, as it would only add >>> > features (all of the default methods) from Predicate, not remove any >>> > features or backwards compatibility. > > Cheers, > > Peter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
