Yeah, as long as the full range is validated it should be fine. K
2015-09-27 19:17 GMT+02:00 Adrian Crum <[email protected]>: > The address range 127.0.0.0 to 127.255.255.255 is reserved for loopback > testing. It seems pretty straightforward to me. > > Adrian Crum > Sandglass Software > www.sandglass-software.com > > On 9/27/2015 8:07 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: >> >> 127.0.0.1 is not always the address for localhost. This is a can of worms >> big enough to drive a medium-sized container ship into >> >> Kristian >> 27. sep. 2015 4.13 p.m. skrev "Benedikt Ritter" <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hm... since localhost is usually only an alias for 127.0.0.1 it doesn't >>> really make sense to allow one but not the other. >>> >>> 2015-09-25 23:18 GMT+02:00 Adrian Crum >>> <[email protected] >>>> >>>> : >>> >>> >>>> I was just looking at the UrlValidator test and I noticed that localhost >>>> is allowed in the URL if the ALLOW_LOCAL_URLS flag is set, and it is not >>>> allowed if the ALLOW_LOCAL_URLS flag is not set. >>>> >>>> If the ALLOW_LOCAL_URLS is not set, a loopback IP address (127.0.0.1) >>>> URL >>>> will validate. It seems to me that it shouldn't - to be consistent with >>> >>> the >>>> >>>> localhost behavior. >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Adrian Crum >>>> Sandglass Software >>>> www.sandglass-software.com >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://people.apache.org/~britter/ >>> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ >>> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter >>> http://github.com/britter >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
