On 28 November 2015 at 20:13, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/28/15 12:02 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 27, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Are you saying that the jar in the bin zip includes classes that are >>>> instrumented for use with Cobertura? If so, that would be a -1 indeed. >>>> >>> Yes, looks like it. New need to find a way to get rid of this thing in cp >>> or whatever is dragging it in. > Sorry, s/New/we above. >> Good catch. Downgrade to 2.6. >> https://github.com/mojohaus/cobertura-maven-plugin/issues/11 > > I see now the version spec is in the pom. > > I guess we all just need to avoid the bad version or get rid of the > plugin altogether. Or omit the site goal when cutting releases.
The current CP has profiles for Cobertura and Jacoco. These are not enabled by default, but can be enabled manually or by using marker files: http://commons.apache.org/commons-parent-pom.html#cobertura_profile If the component POM has got settings for either tool, they should probably be removed so the parent POM can do its job. > Phil >> >> Cheers, >> Jörg >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
