On 30 November 2015 at 08:11, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Le 29/10/2015 17:08, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>> I know we had talked about apis and versions but at this point it seems
>> like any kind of release would be good. I am ok with major version changes
>> to break BC.
>
> What about using the scheme I suggested for commons-math recently? We
> can release commons-imaging 1.0-beta1 with a dedicated GAV and package
> name (for example org.apache.commons:commons-imaging-beta1 and
> org.apache.commons.imaging.beta1.*).
>
> If there is a consensus on this I can volunteer to manage the release.

+1

Good idea here since we need feedback on the code to complete the API design.

This would even play well with RERO as the GAV/package(s) can readily
be abandoned.

> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to