Hi Thomas,

Am 02.12.2015 um 22:46 schrieb Thomas Neidhart:
> On 12/01/2015 10:25 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> to continue the current series of releases, this is a vote for the
>> second beta version of [configuration] 2.0 based on the first release
>> candidate. After beta1 was released in June there has been some feedback
>> which lead to some minor changes on the API. Details are available in
>> the release notes.
>>
>> Because this is a beta and not yet an official release I did not deploy
>> the artifacts to Nexus; only the distributions were created.
>>
>> Configuration 2.0-beta1 RC2 is available for review here:
>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
>> (revision 11367)
>>
>> Details of changes since 1.10 and the previous beta version are in the
>> release notes:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.0-beta2-rc1/changes-report.html
>>
>> Here is the tag:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_2_0_beta2_RC1
>> (revision 1717329)
>>
>> Site:
>>    http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-2.0-beta2-rc1/
>> (note some links in the menu are not yet working)
>>
>> KEYS:
>>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>>
>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
>> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2100
>> GMT 04-Dec 2015
> 
> Hi Oliver,
> 
> first I looked at the site which reported many test errors.
> 
> Building the source tag / source dist myself using
> 
> Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 2013-09-17
> 17:22:22+0200)
> Maven home: /home/tn/bin/apache-maven-3.1.1
> Java version: 1.7.0_79, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-i386/jre
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> OS name: "linux", version: "3.13.0-63-generic", arch: "i386", family: "unix"
> 
> results in no errors:
> 
> Tests run: 2697, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> 
> so I guess the site build is corrupted.

Thanks for the review!

About the test failures: This is a strange phenomenon, they only seem to
happen in some phases of the site build. I will have to investigate
further. However, this is not new; the site for the last release showed
these errors, too (but I did not notice until now :-(

Oliver

> 
> 
> The rest looks fine, so considering that this is a beta release
> 
> [X] +1 Release these artifacts
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
>>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Oliver
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to