On 12/18/15 3:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 12/17/15 3:57 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> I would like to release the [weaver] component.
>>>
>>> Apache Commons Weaver 1.2 RC1 is available for review at:
>>>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/weaver/ (r11649).
>>>
>>> Maven artifacts are at:
>>>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1132 .
>>>
>>> Tested with Oracle JDKs 7 and 8; IBM JDK 7.
>>>
>>> The Subversion tag is:
>>>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/weaver/tags/1.2_RC1/
>>> (r1720616).
>>>
>>> Site (note some links may be broken; this will be fixed when the site
>>> is deployed):
>>>   http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.2-rc1/index.html
>>>
>>> RAT Report:
>>>   http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.2-rc1/rat-report.html
>>>
>>> Quality Reports (CLIRR/PMD/Checkstyle/Findbugs):
>>>   
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.2-rc1/commons-weaver-parent/commons-weaver-processor/project-reports.html
>>>   
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.2-rc1/commons-weaver-parent/commons-weaver-modules-parent/commons-weaver-privilizer-parent/commons-weaver-privilizer-api/project-reports.html
>>>   
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.2-rc1/commons-weaver-parent/commons-weaver-modules-parent/commons-weaver-privilizer-parent/commons-weaver-privilizer/project-reports.html
>>>   
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.2-rc1/commons-weaver-parent/commons-weaver-modules-parent/commons-weaver-normalizer/project-reports.html
>>>   
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.2-rc1/commons-weaver-parent/commons-weaver-maven-plugin/project-reports.html
>>>   
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.2-rc1/commons-weaver-parent/commons-weaver-antlib/project-reports.html
>>>
>>> Keys: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
>>>   This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after
>>> 2300UTC 20-December 2015
>>>
>>>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>>   [ x ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>> Something has to be added to NOTICE or LICENSE to comply with
>> http://asm.ow2.org/license.html
>>
>> since some ow2 classes are shipped in (at least) the normalizer jar.
>>
> Okay, this seems like a good enough reason to fail RC1 and I can
> pummel the Java 6 build into submission at the same time. Any idea
> what form this attribution should take? Should it all be somehow
> stuffed into the NOTICE file?

I have lost track of the debates around LICENSE vs NOTICE for this
stuff.  I would shove it into NOTICE myself, but I am not sure that
is correct.  Anyone else know?

Of course, ditching the shading would make the problem go away ;)

Phil
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
>> Phil
>>
>>>   Thanks!
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to