Le 2016-04-21 02:39, Gilles a écrit :
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:14:33 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 20 April 2016 at 02:55, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:
Hello.
Let's assume the following:
* Some feature branch has been pushed to the Apache repository.
* That branch fixes an issue reported in JIRA.
Has the JIRA been updated with the details of the code push?
Whenever code was available, I indicated it with a comment on the
corresponding JIRA page; and all comments generate a post to this
list.
* Nobody has raised an objection after some time[1] has passed.
Can we conclude that the code in that branch has been (lazily)
accepted and can be merged into "develop"?[2]
If you are not sure, why not send an email round asking about the
specific commits?
Done.
But the question is: How long should one wait for review (in C-T⁻R
policy)?
I think you can safely consider that the recent development
can be integrated as you want.
best regards,
Luc
A similar situation is: When I post a message on the ML, asking
whether there are objections to some proposed work, how long should
I wait before implementing the suggested solution?
Example:
http://markmail.org/thread/ywdfvyq6hmbaje6u
Regards,
Gilles
[1] What would be reasonable value for the time span?
[2] So that other issues that depend on that code can be worked
on.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
