Hi Ate, Can we create jira tickets for each story in the proposal as a next step?
Regards, Woonsan (Sent from my iPhone) > On Dec 23, 2015, at 7:00 AM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: > > We'll now make a start with executing on the below proposal, moving to Java 8 > first and then introducing JSON datamodel support to replace and drop > XML/XPath datamodel thereafter. > > Regards, Ate > >> On 2015-12-09 10:15, Ate Douma wrote: >> Since early this year the progress and development of Commons SCXML 2.0 has >> severely declined because of two major technical hurdles, and thereafter of >> both motivation and lack of time: >> >> - The SCXML XML/XPath datamodel support has been dropped from the final >> W3C SCXML 1.0 specification [1], because of too many functional and semantic >> complications and limitation, as well as lack of interest for implementing >> it. >> >> The implementation of the XML/XPath datamodel in Commons SCXML has been >> problematic for precisely the same reasons. >> And not being able to provide such implementation properly by us (Commons >> SCXML) actually has been one (final) argument for dropping it from the >> specification... >> >> - The implementation of the Javascript datamodel support based on the >> old/outdated Rhino Javascript engine in Java 7 and below, turned out to be >> quite difficult. While it turns out to be much easier and reliable, but >> different, with the new Nashorn Javascript engine in Java 8+. >> >> After bringing this first up on the user@ list earlier this week, I now want >> to >> propose the following major changes to revive the further development towards >> Commons SCXML 2.0: >> - drop the support for XML/XPath based datamodel, and instead introduce a >> much >> easier to implement and support JSON datamodel as alternative, for all >> current >> Commons SCXML support 'languages': JEXL, Groovy and Javascript. >> - bump the minimum Java version to 8 so we can leverage and only need to >> support >> the Nashorn Javascript engine >> >> The only user response so far on user@ is fully in favor of these changes, >> and both myself and Woonsan Ko are motivated to continue developing and >> completing the goals for Commons SCXML 2.0 based on these changes. >> >> If nobody here has strong arguments against the above proposal (and assuming >> lazy consensus otherwise), we would like to start on these changes shortly, >> before the end of the year. >> >> Kind regards, >> Ate Douma >> Woonsan Ko >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-scxml-20150901/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >
