On 16 May 2016 at 08:33, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I assume you mean Commons VFS 2.1. > > The second release candidate was effectively pulled because we were > missing a LICENSE/NOTICE entry:
Surely it has not yet been established whether an entry is needed or not? Therefore the VOTE can remain open whilst this is determined. > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/Zif1iomxs7u25tt > > This should be trivial to fix, but also important to get right legally. Maybe no fix is needed. See else-thread. > > I assume Josh Elser (as the Release Manager for this candidate) will > formally mark the 2.1 RC2 thread as [CANCELLED] and then we can > prepare a new RC3 for voting. Again, perhaps not necessary. > ..but be aware that many Apache committers have been involved with > ApacheCon which just finished last Friday, so folks probably have lots > of things to catch up on. > > On 16 May 2016 at 01:45, Dmitry Goldenberg <dgoldenberg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Could someone summarize the state of the VOTE for 2.1? >> >> Thank you. > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating) > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
