On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:

> Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um
> 22:40 Uhr:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Benedikt Ritter <benerit...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> dbrosIus <dbros...@baybroadband.net> schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um
> > >> 22:32 Uhr:
> > >>
> > >> > It is still not functionally compatible.  People parsing UNKNOWN
> > >> > annotations looking for generics (as was the right way before)  will
> > now
> > >> > fail.   Better rip the generic support out too.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Okay, if this is the case I haven't understood the situation
> correctly.
> > If
> > >> our plan is to make a release that covers Java 8, we should go all the
> > >> way.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I think the immediate need is to avoid blowing up on Java 8. I see this
> > as
> > > a 5.x BC release needed ASAP that the Maven plugin(s) can pick up, also
> > > ASAP.
> > >
> >
> > It's a Maven plugin that blows up IIRC.
> >
>
> Okay, if some one goes ahead and fixes the two interface problems, I can
> RM.
>


@Benedikt: Thank you for volunteering to RM!

@Sebb: Are you available for this task?

Gary


>
> Benedikt
>
>
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > -------- Original message --------
> > >> > From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
> > >> > Date: 06/02/2016  4:22 PM  (GMT-05:00)
> > >> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> > >> > Subject: Re: [bcel] Deprecated InstructionConstants
> > >> >
> > >> > Okay, so were are we now?
> > >> >
> > >> > - people are waiting for a new release
> > >> > - package coords have changed - BC is broken
> > >> > - sebb has put effort into making all changes compatible
> > >> > - two interface changes remain
> > >> >
> > >> > Is that correct? Then let's just get over with this two interfaces
> > mach
> > >> > make the API redesign afterwards. Let's create two extension
> > interfaces
> > >> > release this stuff with the old package and maven coord and we're
> > done.
> > >> >
> > >> > sebb <seb...@gmail.com> schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um 14:19 Uhr:
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 2 June 2016 at 12:35, Jörg Schaible <
> > >> joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > Hi,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > sebb wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Hang on please.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> There were plans to produce a new incompatible release with new
> > >> Maven
> > >> > > >> coords and new package names.
> > >> > > >> However as I recall there was some pushback from users who
> wished
> > >> to
> > >> > > >> have a drop-in release.
> > >> > > >> That is not possible unless the release is binary compatible.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The question is, why does one want to have a BC release? If
> Oliver
> > >> uses
> > >> > > it
> > >> > > > as drop-in replacement, he will not use any new stuff, i.e. he
> > >> might be
> > >> > > > interested to get simply a version working with Java 8 runtime.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> So I spent quite a bit of effort reworking the changes so as to
> > >> > > >> facilitate a binary compatible release.
> > >> > > >> As far as I can recall, that effort was successful apart from
> > >> changes
> > >> > > >> to an interface (or two).
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> There were some ideas as to how to resolve the interface
> > >> > > >> incompatibilty, but no agreement was reached.
> > >> > > >> I think the options were:
> > >> > > >> - introduce new interface(s) extending the old one(s)
> > >> > > >> - keep the interface(s) and handle any runtime errors
> > >> > > >> - use the Java 8 (?) facility which allows an interface to
> > contain
> > >> a
> > >> > > >> method implementation.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Note that the code does not yet support some Java 8 features.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I'd really go on with bcel6 and new GAV using Java 8 as minimum
> > and
> > >> > > backport
> > >> > > > anything to 5.x that is required to let BCEL run on Java 8
> > runtime,
> > >> but
> > >> > > > nothing else.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I am normally also in the BC camp, but I realize that we stress
> it
> > >> > > sometimes
> > >> > > > too much and actually harm further development of a component.
> > After
> > >> > > several
> > >> > > > years of (public) inactivity of a component, we should really
> take
> > >> the
> > >> > > > advantage for a cut.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The effort to release an additional 5.x after a major 6.0 is
> > >> negligible
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Not sure I agree the effort is negligible.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > compared to the constant annoyance by the limits of ancient JDKs
> > >> > working
> > >> > > on
> > >> > > > the interesting stuff for a component.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The JDK required to run BCEL is orthogonal to compatibility.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Indeed there was a proposal to use Java 8 default interface
> methods
> > to
> > >> > > get round the issue with compatibility.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please let's not conflate the two issues.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Cheers,
> > >> > > > Jörg
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> > > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >
>



-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to