Hi, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> schrieb am Fr., 10. Juni 2016 um 18:42 Uhr:
> Not ATM. It seems to me we had a little flurry of activity a couple of > years ago but then nothing happened. I remember messages about releasing > what we have as a 1.0 and then following up with a non-BC 2.0 or something > like that. > > The issue is time and the need for someone to take a look from a SME POV > and API POV to see if what we have is what we want to put in stone for a > 1.0. > I've worked on Imaging a year ago. We had like 10 RCs but we never released 1.0 The initial developers went away (btw. the same happened to OGNL). The main problem seem to be the find bugs and checkstyle violations. It mostly boils down to working the array references without making a secure copy. I don't know how to fix that without degrading performance. Benedikt > > Gary > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hello Gary, > > > > are you planning to roll a (long over due) release for Imaging? > > > > Benedikt > > > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
