Yes, but non-binding. On 13 June 2016 at 01:29, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> schrieb am So., 12. Juni 2016 um 19:56 Uhr: > > > Chances are that this library may be obsoleted in Java 10 with value > types > > anyways, but that is years from now. > > > > So that's a +1 from your side? > > > > > > On 12 June 2016 at 11:39, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > On 12 Jun 2016 4:18 p.m., "Benedikt Ritter" <brit...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > there hasn't been any activity in the primitives component for a long > > > > while: > > > > > > > > - last release dates back to 2003-11-05 > > > > - using svn log -l 50 > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/primitives/trunk I > did > > > not > > > > find a single commit that changed any of the code > > > > - no activity on dev@ and user@ > > > > > > > > I think we can conclude that there is no more interest in this > > component. > > > > For this reason I'm calling a vote for moving the Apache Commons > > > Primitives > > > > component to dormant. This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours > from > > > > now, i.e. sometime after 17:30 CEST 12-June 2016. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, yes move Primitives to dormant > > > > [ ] +/- 0, I'm not sure... > > > > [ ] -1, no, do NOT move Primitives to dormant, because... > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Benedikt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
