Hi Jochen, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > >> Maybe. That could depend on whether there is anyone at Commons that would >> want to participate in the component. Another option is to follow the >> pattern used by httpclient. I believe they took the last version of >> commons httpclient and left a pointer to it in their new web site. But >> what followed as a TLP was completely different and wasn’t binary >> compatible. The community seemed to be completely fine with that. > > Quite right. But I definitely cannot imagine anyone desiring three > development lines (Hipparchus, a fork outside Commons, and a component > inside). Why three? OK, we cannot control Hipparchus, so we can let it aside. The proposal of Eric and Gilles just describe a scenario where some code of the big dumping ground CM that has a wide audience and only slightly tied to deep mathematical theory is ripped out into individual components of Commons and the rest is moved into a Math TLP and divided there. So where do you see two development lines at Apache (at least for the same code)? Cheers, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
