If the devs are not ready to start working on 4.x then I agree it should be marked as dormant.
On 3 July 2016 at 15:03, Benedikt Ritter <[email protected]> wrote: > Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]> schrieb am So., 3. Juli 2016 um > 01:27 Uhr: > >> Le 2/07/2016 à 21:15, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : >> >> > currently nobody seems to be pushing [ognl]. However the original project >> > on GitHub seems to be pretty active [1] - the last release was published >> > just three days ago. This gives me the impression that the project never >> > really joined Apache Commons. Do we need to act? >> >> The README file on GitHub states: >> >> "The code base sometime ago was migrated to the Apache commons ognl and >> this source code is used just to maintenance 3.x branch. The new version >> from Apache will start from 4.x" >> >> We could suggest Lukasz to bring the 3.x maintenance at Apache Commons. >> I suspect moving OGNL to Git would be a prerequisite. >> > > This would require a change of the maven and package coordinates which > effectively would be a 4.x > > >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
