Hi Gilles, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> schrieb am Do., 18. Aug. 2016 um 16:46 Uhr:
> Hi. > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:33:30 +0000, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hello, > > > > <er...@apache.org> schrieb am Do., 18. Aug. 2016 um 16:32 Uhr: > > > >> Repository: commons-rng > >> Updated Branches: > >> refs/heads/master cccd43c05 -> 294fa53a2 > >> > >> > >> Fix dependency info. > >> > >> > >> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/repo > >> Commit: > >> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/commit/55e935ef > >> Tree: > >> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/tree/55e935ef > >> Diff: > >> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/diff/55e935ef > >> > >> Branch: refs/heads/master > >> Commit: 55e935ef14fdc66b9872feeb96629917adaaf6a0 > >> Parents: cccd43c > >> Author: Gilles <er...@apache.org> > >> Authored: Thu Aug 18 18:01:52 2016 +0200 > >> Committer: Gilles <er...@apache.org> > >> Committed: Thu Aug 18 18:01:52 2016 +0200 > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> pom.xml | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > >> > >> > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/blob/55e935ef/pom.xml > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml > >> index 807babc..2843c90 100644 > >> --- a/pom.xml > >> +++ b/pom.xml > >> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ > >> > >> > >> > <commons.osgi.private>org.apache.commons.rng.internal</commons.osgi.private> > >> <!-- do not use snapshot suffix here --> > >> <commons.release.version>1.0</commons.release.version> > >> - <commons.release.desc>(requires Java > >> 1.5+)</commons.release.desc> > >> + <commons.release.desc>(requires Java 1.6+) > > > > > > Whould be okay for me to go with 1.7 right away. > > There was a discussion about that (cf. archive). > Short summary: we can stick with 1.6 for the time being (only a few > lines of code would benefit from 1.7). > D'oh, I should stop writing before I finish going through the pile of mails that has gathered during my absence :o) Thank you Benedikt > > Regards, > Gilles > > P.S. A thing we did not consider is whether a JAR compiled for 1.7 > would provide > a performance enhancement. > If that's the case, users of later Java versions should recompile > rather > than use the JAR provided by Apache. Perhaps this is more > important than > loosing JDK 6 potential users. > Developers who still have JDK 6 and 7 installed are welcome to run > the > benchmarks (JMH-ready in "src/test"). > > > >> </commons.release.desc> > >> <!-- <commons.rc.version>RC1</commons.rc.version> --> > >> <commons.binary.suffix>-bin</commons.binary.suffix> > >> > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
