On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 14:22:04 +0300, Artem Barger wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:
A few quick runs seems to produce numbers that are now much
closer to what JMH produces.[1]
What do you think?
How I can produce results with PerfTestUtils? Is there any script to
run
RandomStressTester?
"RandomStressTester" is in Commons _Rng_ "src/userguide" example
code, while I've just committed "RandomNumberGeneratorBenchmark"
in Commons _Math_ userguide examples (branch "develop").
There is a README in "src/userguide"; basically, you'd run with a
command similar to:
$ mvn -q exec:java \
-Dexec.mainClass=org.apache.commons.math4.userguide.rng.RandomNumberGeneratorBenchmark
\
-Dexec.args="MT ISAAC JDK"
where the "exec.args" contains a list of "RandomSource" identifiers.
It possible that previous results were produced on loaded computer,
hence
the bias.
Unlikely to be the reason because:
1. the computer was not overloaded,
2. the same load would be seen by all benchmarked codes (that is
precisely the purpose of "PerfTestUtils").
Anyways, this is all becoming rather moot since the previous
figures are not reproducible...
Best regards,
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org