JSONLD-Java switched to JsonLd, after originally using uppercased versions, to match the terminology casing used by the final JSON-LD-API-1.0 specification:
https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld-api/#the-application-programming-interface The capitalisation in the project name is just kept for posterity at this point. If it would simplify things just to rely on the prefix, you may be able to drop the Impl suffix without confusion. Cheers, Peter On 15 September 2016 at 13:01, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13 Sep 2016 2:15 a.m., "Gary Gregory" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> For names, I like CamelCaseEvenForAcronyms, like IbmXmlSaxParser instead > of >> IBMXMLSAXParser. > > As well :-) > > And I am not sure which class or package prefix to use for JSONLD-Java.. > JsonLd is what is used within its classes. And RDF4J is their official > spelling and what is used as their class prefix. > > But I think at this stage we don't want to rename now say RDFTerm > interface, so would then not JsonLdRdfTermImpl look weirder than > JsonLdRDFTermImpl? > > Or not so stringent, then RDF4JRDFTerm can become RDF4JTerm :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
