Le 28/09/2016 à 13:40, Gilles a écrit :

> If not, then random utilities are not best located in Commons Lang,
> because indeed the no-dep requirement forces you to go through
> "java.util.Random" which is bad (TM) for several reasons, mentioned
> here, there, and everywhere.

I agree java.util.Random is suboptimal as an implementation, but it's
perfectly fine as an interface. It can be swapped with a
java.security.SecureRandom if quality matters.

Emmanuel Bourg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to