On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 00:40:47 -0700 (PDT), wilbur wrote:
I am fine to submit a PR that reverts LUDecomposition to the standard
method
used in Jama.
Is that method better in all cases (w.r.t. performance _and_
accuracy)? [If there are trade-offs, it might be interesting
to provide both alternatives.]
Overall, the decomposition code in "LUDecomposition" code is
less than 50 lines; it would be nice to discover why the
performance is so much different...
Regards,
Gilles
--Wilhelm
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
