+1 On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Brent Worden <brent.wor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are the originally mentioned transforms in or out of scope of > commons-numbers? > > Brent > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> > wrote: > > > See discussion thread, copied below. > > > > [ ] Yes > > [ ] Yes but I prefer this name: ... > > [ ] No, because ... > > > > I'll assume that this is a lazy consensus vote, to be closed in 72 hours > > from now (i.e. on January 12, at 18:00:00 UTC). > > > > Thanks, > > Gilles > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 15:57:51 +0000, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 9 January 2017 at 11:46, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> > wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:08:18 +0100, Eric Barnhill wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> It is overall a fine plan by me. A precision class makes more sense > than > >>>> duplicating equals methods. > >>>> > >>>> From a practical standpoint I think it would be better to see > Quaternion > >>>> in > >>>> its own subpackage than with Complex. Simply because I don't use them > >>>> and > >>>> packages are better maintained by those who use them. > >>>> > >>>> It is hard to see how the transforms fit in. If anything they belong > >>>> with > >>>> the new sigproc libraries. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Fine. > >>> > >>> Is there any objection on the name "Commons Numbers"? > >>> > >> > >> Since the namespace belongs to the whole of Commons, this question > >> should be posed to all of Commons, i.e. using the [ALL] prefix. > >> > >> Are there better matches for the intended scope? [Or do we want that > >>> the scope grows to also contain the "o.a.c.math4.prime" package" and > >>> possibly more of number-theoretic functionality (as was proposed some > >>> time ago to be added to Commons Math)?] > >>> > >>> Shall I wait a couple of days before filing the request with INFRA? > >>> [I.e. to change the "git" repository, JIRA project and github mirror.] > >>> > >>> > >>> Gilles > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Eric > >>>> On 8 Jan 2017 10:17, "Gilles" <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi. > >>>>> > >>>>> How about renaming the component to "Commons Numbers" (or another > name > >>>>> if preferred) that would contain the following modules: > >>>>> * commons-numbers-core (with classes such as "Precision"). > >>>>> * commons-numbers-complex > >>>>> * commons-numbers-quaternion > >>>>> * commons-numbers-fraction > >>>>> * commons-numbers-continued-fraction > >>>>> * commons-numbers-fft (Fast Fourier Transform) > >>>>> * commons-numbers-fct (Fast Cosine Transform) > >>>>> * ... > >>>>> ? > >>>>> > >>>>> Gilles > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > >
