Github user ansell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/27
Service discovery for other instances of RDFSyntax/Parsers can be done
separately.
The main objection was for users of the RDFSyntax interface to be able to
offer multiple content types and file extensions in addition to the official
versions. They can be implemented by a default method that just returns the
official content type and file extension inside of Commons RDF, but the fact
that the method is available makes it possible to support the use case.
Returning a List, with the first element by convention being the official
version similar to RDF4J may be useful, rather than an unordered Set. However,
that isn't necessary, given they should be using the other methods if they
definitely want the official extension/content type.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
