So it would be a 3.0. Do we expect anything else in a potential 3.0? Le 8 sept. 2017 16:38, "Thomas Vandahl" <t...@apache.org> a écrit :
On 06.09.17 20:54, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Ok so sounds a 2.3 from master for next release is ok, or are you bound > somehow to 2.2 ans prefer some backports? It should not have sounded like that. All the mentioned changes in trunk *break binary compatibility* and require a major version update. Bye, Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
