This could be an argument that goes the way of source code formatting ;-) but my simplest reasons are: - It all lines up nicely all the time - It hints that we intend to supply bug fix releases
Gary On Nov 2, 2017 08:32, "Benedikt Ritter" <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Gary, > > > Am 02.11.2017 um 15:28 schrieb Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>: > > > > How about calling it 1.1.0? > > See Emmanuels answer on the other thread. Why would we do that? :-) > > Regards, > Benedikt > > > > > Gary > > > > On Nov 2, 2017 07:33, "Mark Thomas" <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> I have finished working through the Commons Daemon open issues and I am > >> ready to tag and call the release vote. I wanted to give folks a heads > >> up and an opportunity scratch any Daemon related itches before I tag. > >> Unless there are objections, I plan to tag in ~24 hours. > >> > >> Mark > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
