On 2018-02-10, Gilles wrote: > Is there a convention for distinguishing codes with > compatibility requirements from codes provided as > development tools (unit tests, benchmarking, usage > examples, integration tests, ...)?
In Compress we once had a package named _internal_ and a package level javadoc that said "This package is not part of Commons Compress' published API." http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-compress/javadocs/api-1.7/org/apache/commons/compress/compressors/z/_internal_/package-summary.html There also is a package that says "Experimental" in its javadocs, but to be honest it hasn't change din years (but likely isn't really used by anybody either). Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
