Thanks all. This has gone elsewhere. Matt
On Mar 19, 2018 8:21 PM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I’ve used NotImplementedException as a way to do this. In Scala, there is a > function called ??? which throws a similar exception, and in Kotlin, > there’s an equivalent function called TODO. > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 20:09, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Been out with the flu, jumping in late... > > > > It seems like using one or more annotations would be better for > tooling... > > > > Gary > > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018, 07:57 Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:20:18 +0100, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Gilles > > > > <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Perhaps "Commons Testing". > > > >> IIUC, such calls are not meant to appear in released code. > > > > > > > > Neither would testing. > > > > > > Exactly, and the reason why I proposed that home. > > > Rationale is pretty obvious IMHO: code that contains calls > > > to a "Todo" class is under test (or in beta state). > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > I like the idea of a Todo class. Makes > > > > searching for such places extremely neat, and simple. > > > > > > > > Jochen > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >
