Hi.
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 13:34:04 +0200, Eric Barnhill wrote:
Based on my review of the JIRA open issues, I think there are three
remaining issues for a numbers-complex release,
Please set the status to "resolved" for issues which you've
handled; mentioning the commit id would be nice.
assuming we proceed with
the plan to leave ComplexUtils out of the first release:
1) a parse method, so that Complex fits all requirements for being a
VALJO
2) deciding whether we have a lot of constants (such as
Complex.MINUS_I) or
the minimum necessary for the class to run (such as Complex.ZERO)
3) updated documentation in the user guide
4) Issue NUMBERS-65 must be handled too (as part of the API).[1]
I suggested that the userguide could be rewritten with "apt".
[See discussion in posts by Greg and Brian Driscoll, as part of GSoC.]
If this sounds good to all interested parties I will finish these up.
As
for (2), I would lean toward just having a minimum for now.
+1
Gilles
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-65
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
