This is all fine with me. Should we give a VFS example on the Compress site?
Gary On Sat, May 5, 2018, 09:56 Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all > > sorry to bother you again. > > It seems we won't be able to figure out what the high level API we'd > want to provide should look like any time soon, or even whether we want > to provide one at all. If Commons VFS already provides the high level > API that is needed, there isn't anything we need to do at all and things > are fine :-) > > Given the current state of master I propose to do the following: > > * spin out a new branch from current master so if we want to ever go > back to the scratchpad of APIs things are still reachable and don't > get garbage collected by git. > > * change back commons-compress' Main class to Lister (and maybe make > that support 7z). > > * remove everything from the current oacc.archivers.examples package > > * move the Archiver and Expander classes from oacc.archivers to > oacc.archivers.examples. Clearly label them as examples with APIs we > are willing to break with every release without giving notice. > > * remove the (File)Filter support from Archiver and Expander > > Is this OK with everybody, any objections? > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
