Keep in mind the option of releasing an alpha or beta version first to allow for API changes...
Gary On Sun, Aug 12, 2018, 03:12 Bruno P. Kinoshita <brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: > Oh, sounds reasonable. > So going to try 1.0 with Java 7, then possibly another bug fix release > after that (there are some issues I'd like to fix, but after 1.0 is out). > And finally in 1.2 or after we can go to Java 8. > Thanks Pascal! > Bruno > > From: Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net> > To: dev@commons.apache.org > Sent: Sunday, 12 August 2018 9:00 PM > Subject: Re: [imaging] Move from Java7 to Java8 > > Hi Bruno, > > imho it would be preferable to release 1.0 using Java 7. That would > allow everybody using snapshots to replace them with a release. E.g. > https://github.com/LibrePDF/OpenPDF is using a snapshot but is still on > Java 7. > > After the release we can update to Java 8 for 1.1. > > Cheers, > Pascal > > Am 12.08.2018 um 00:46 schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita: > > Hi all, > > > > Since Sanselan became Commons Imaging, some work has been done, but > there was never an official release. > > > > The project is using Java7, and I would like to update it to use Java 8. > Any objections? > > > > My plan is to just update to Java8 now and prepare the 1.0 release vote. > Then slowly add Java 8 improvements over the 1.x releases, and perhaps even > add support to Java 9 before a 2.x if possible. > > > > > > Thanks > > Bruno > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > >
