On 2018-08-12, Rob Tompkins wrote: > I agree with this statement generally. That said, this doesn’t > surprise me that I made this error because japicmp is minimally > cumbersome to work with.
I didn't mean to blame you, sorry if you received it that way. Fully agreed that japicmp is a pain, but for some reason we had to give up clirr (which is completely unsupported AFAIK). > It feels very unfinished/unpolished. Next time I get into [parent], > I’ll try to go up and submit more polishing work to the japicmp > codebase. Before I dive in I wanted to be sure there was no better reason to skip it. I can quickly add a property japicmp.skip, set that to true by default and false inside of the profile. This should fix things for parent 48. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
