I would call it "alpha1" instead of just "alpha". Gary
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018, 06:58 Bruno P. Kinoshita <ki...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am almost done following the docs to prepare a release. Didn't struggle > as much as I expected with the release-plugin. Had more trouble getting the > MANIFEST.MF entries corrected. > > But now, before I create the dist tag, and upload the zip/tar.gz (this was > not executed by the release plugin because... it's a project that uses > assembly plugin I think), I would like to confirm a few things > > - The version release is 1.0-alpha > - The changes.xml is for 1.0. I found that commons-lang appears to have > had a 3.0-beta. The changes.xml contains the entries for 3.0, with an HTML > comment showing which changes were added post 3.0-beta. So I did the same > for imaging > - RELEASE-NOTES.txt is still saying 1.0... should it be 1.0-alpha? > - What else would need to be updated? The site perhaps??? Or is it OK to > have a few places showing 1.0? > > I have time to work on the RC1 vote until Monday NZ time this week. So if > I manage to get these points sorted, we might be able to call the RC1 vote, > and leave it running until the next weekend - or cancel it during the week > in case of an error, and then I could prepare RC2 next weekend I think. > > > Thanks! > Bruno > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
