On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 17:00:19 -0700, Eric Barnhill wrote:
Second question, is there any reason not to use syntactic sugar for
distinctions between "multiply" and "
multpliedBy"? With the former being the suger, if the latter is a
better
standard.
Statement needs some reference before we embark on changing names
for longer ones. Cf. my previous post:
https://markmail.org/message/r5hxy5f4eduxp2vn
[If the rationale is "correct English", fine, but then all the
modules must be modified accordingly.]
It seems like both sides of the fence can be easily bridged here.
IMO, syntactic sugar should be justified by more than sparing
4 keystrokes, especially if we want to induce usage of proper
spelling.
Regards,
Gilles
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 4:57 PM Eric Barnhill <ericbarnh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 1:52 AM Stephen Colebourne
<scolebou...@joda.org>
wrote:
The order of the static constants is also strange - I'm sure a more
logical order could be chosen.
I have rearranged the constants into the order 0, 1, 1/2, 1/3, 2/3,
1/4,
3/4 . I propose dropping the constants
for fifths and negative one. One needs to draw the line somewhere
reasonable. Any objections?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
