On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 2:03 PM Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I thought Commons Logging 1.2 required Java 1.2? Big leap to 8!
>

The current POM requires Java 6.

Gary


>
> Same bias here for Log4j2, though adding simple default methods like that
> would be neat for any APIs stuck using it (like Spring Framework for
> example).
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 14:52, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Balazs,
> >
> > To me, as a biased contributor to Apache Log4j 2, I think the Log4j API
> > should be new facade to use instead of Commons Logging.
> >
> > That said, please feel free to contribute PRs to Commons Logging for
> those
> > using that API ;-)
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/commons-logging
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 1:24 PM Balazs Toth <zsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am wondering to extend the org.apache.commons.logging.Log interface
> > with
> > > default methods.
> > >
> > > It could simplify the usage, instead of
> > >
> > > if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
> > >         log.debug("something heavy  " + here);
> > > }
> > >
> > > could use lambda expression
> > > log.debug(() -> "something heavy  " + here);
> > >
> > > to prevent the payload creation if the certain log level not enabled.
> > >
> > > so the org.apache.commons.logging.Log interface would get the following
> > > default methods:
> > >
> > >         default void debug(Supplier<Object> msgSupplier) {
> > >                 if (isDebugEnabled()) {
> > >                         debug(msgSupplier != null ? msgSupplier.get() :
> > > null);
> > >                 }
> > >         }
> > >
> > >         default void debug(Supplier<Object> msgSupplier, Throwable t) {
> > >                 if (isDebugEnabled()) {
> > >                         debug(msgSupplier != null ? msgSupplier.get() :
> > > null, t);
> > >                 }
> > >         }
> > >
> > > of course not just for debug, I would create for all the log levels.
> > >
> > > Obviously that should need a new version like 1.3.0 because the Java
> > > source and target level must raise to 1.8 from the current 1.6.
> > >
> > > What do you think, is the community would accept this change?
> > >
> > > Regards, Balazs
> >
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>

Reply via email to