Hi Gary, I've just posted a PR for VFS-687 (with HttpClient *5*). When you have some time, please take a review.
Thanks! Woonsan On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 12:11 PM Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org> wrote: > > Thanks again, Gary! > Just as heads-up, I've created two tickets: VFS-686 and VFS-687. The > former is about upgrading Jackrabbit dependency on which the webdav FS > provider depends, and the latter is about adding "http5(s)" FS > provider as a new http library option. > > I will try to submit pull requests for each, one by one--even if it > takes months on my part time, but please feel free to chime or jump in > if anyone is interested in. > > Kind regards, > > Woonsan > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 11:40 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks Woonsan! I applied the patch. > > > > Gary > > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:49 PM Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:16 AM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Gary, > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:54 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Woonsan, > > > > > > > > > > > > I've applied the patch as is and all it well. Thank you! > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Food for thought: We should also consider HttpClient *5* which just > > > > > > released its second beta (I am helping there as well.) > > > > > > > > > > > > If you feel like adding another provider for HttpClient 5 Beta 2 (it > > > is > > > > > in > > > > > > a different package as the API is different), that would give us the > > > most > > > > > > flexibility perhaps. > > > > > > > > > > I do. I'll try it out and hopefully submit a pull request with a new > > > > > JIRA ticket some day. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At some point in the future we can decide which provide would be > > > mapped > > > > > to > > > > > > "http" and "https". > > > > > > > > > > > > To that end, I wonder if the current "http" provider based on > > > HttpClient > > > > > 3 > > > > > > should be repackaged as "http3" so that we can create the underlying > > > > > toggle > > > > > > and test it. > > > > > > > > > > It seems already possible IIUC: > > > > > - StandardFileSystemManager's parsing logic on providers.xml allows a > > > > > provider to register multiple schemes. For example, JarFileProvider > > > > > has already registered itself with jar, jar, ear, etc. > > > > > - So, we may set the schemes for the current default HttpFileProvider > > > > > (HTTPClient3 based) to both "http3" and "http". "http3s" and "https" > > > > > for the corresponding one accordingly. > > > > > - At some moment later, when deciding which one to be the default > > > > > "http" or "https" provider, we can simply change the providers.xml. > > > > > > > > > > I will submit another simple PR to set the default ones to [ "http3", > > > > > "http" ] and [ "http3s", "https" ] soon. > > > > > > > > > > Am I in the right track? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think so :-) > > > > > > I thought it could be trivial, but there were somethings more to care. > > > Now I see... ;-) > > > > > > Anyway, I've submitted one more PR for VFS-360: > > > - https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/40 > > > > > > concerning these: > > > > > > - Set the old HttpClient v3 provider to both schemes: http3/s, http/s. > > > So, we can use it through http3/s schemes as well. > > > - Improved Shell to easily switch providers.xml configuration through > > > system property. e.g, mvn -Pshell -Dhttp3 -Dhttp4 > > > -Dproviders=providers-http4-default.xml, with an example in > > > commons-vfs2-examples/ to set http4/s as the default http/s. See the > > > example test scenarios in commons-vfs2-examples/README.md for detail. > > > - Added `pwfs` command to print the current working file system, next > > > to `pwd`, in Shell, which is useful when verifying which file system > > > is actually used with http/s URLs for example. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Woonsan > > > > > > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Woonsan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 6:42 PM Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could someone please review my PR? > > > > > > > - https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/38 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Woonsan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 9:11 AM Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Bernd / Experts, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've submitted a PR for VFS-360. Find my summary in the comment > > > as > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > - https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/38 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you please review the changes? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Woonsan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Bernd, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your remarks. Please see my comments inline below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Bernd Eckenfels < > > > > > > > e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Hello, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> I am for http4. In the begining it wont be maped in the > > > > > > > StandardManager but can be changed later on. > > > > > > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> I do wonder if we can get rid of a Special https Provider and > > > have > > > > > > > only one (http4) which can handle both Kinds of URLs… not quite > > > sure, > > > > > what > > > > > > > do you think? > > > > > > > > > From user's perspective, it seems better to keep 'https' > > > separately > > > > > > > > > from 'http'. 'http4s' and 'http4' accordingly. > > > > > > > > > We can possibly consider nesting or adding somethings in > > > > > > > > > configuration, for example to allow > > > > > > > > > 'http4://www.example.com/index.html', > > > > > > > > > 'http4:http://www.example.com/index.html' (equivalent to the > > > > > first) or > > > > > > > > > 'http4:https://www.example.com/index.html. But that doesn't > > > seem > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > make anything more convenient than simply allowing either > > > > > > > > > 'http4://www.example.com/index.html' or > > > > > > > > > 'http4s://www.example.com/index.html'. > > > > > > > > > So, I'm personally inclined to keep the existing pattern to > > > have > > > > > > > > > separate providers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Besides that, I wonder if we also (only?) should consider the > > > new > > > > > JDK > > > > > > > httpclient api? > > > > > > > > > As I'm trying to scratch my own itch, I'd opt for providing a > > > > > solution > > > > > > > > > with HttpComponents HttpClient v4 first. ;-) Also, it's very > > > > > matured > > > > > > > > > and well-accepted, comparing with the new JDK HttpClient. > > > > > > > > > I'm open to a possibility in the near future for a new > > > > > > > > > separate > > > > > > > > > provider, possibly called 'jdkhttp' with JDK HttpClient > > > > > > > > > module. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Woonsan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Gruss > > > > > > > > >> Bernd > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > > >> http://bernd.eckenfels.net > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Von: Woonsan Ko > > > > > > > > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. August 2018 18:35 > > > > > > > > >> An: Commons Developers List > > > > > > > > >> Betreff: [vfs] new http4 provider, not replace http? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> I'm trying to contribute for VFS-360. What a nice ticket > > > number! > > > > > > > > >> After a brief look, I'm considering to add a new provider in > > > > > > > > >> a > > > > > > > > >> separate package, 'http4' (based on HttpComponents > > > HttpClient), > > > > > > > > >> keeping the old one, 'http' (based on the old Commons > > > HttpClient), > > > > > > > > >> as-is. The reason is that I don't want to break any public > > > > > methods of > > > > > > > > >> the http provider package in v2.x range. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> BTW, Apache Camel has a similar concept: http component with > > > v3 > > > > > and > > > > > > > > >> http4 component with v4. [1] > > > > > > > > >> A difference is we need one more equivalent to the old > > > 'https', > > > > > like > > > > > > > > >> 'http4s'. It sounds a bit weird though. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Any insights? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Woonsan > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> [1] http://camel.apache.org/components.html > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
