Thanks for reminding me of that, Bill. I have a local branch where I’ve rebased 2_0 onto master, and reworked things where needed. I’ll review that again to see where things stand. It was a lot of work last time, so I’ll plan to go forward without it for now, and try to get a 2.0 release out after the one proposed below. I’ll likely need your help in reviewing the final results. :)
> On Dec 30, 2019, at 6:36 AM, William Speirs <wspe...@apache.org> wrote: > > That 2.0 release attempt was mine... Feel free to blow it away, and proceed > with your release as 2.0. > > However, most of my changes in there should be working. The changes add > named parameter support, and a fluent API to the library. The only reason > it wasn't released was because I couldn't figure out the release process, > and after much frustration, gave up: > http://www.sop4j.com/2014/01/dbutils.html?m=1 > <http://www.sop4j.com/2014/01/dbutils.html?m=1> > > If you want to include my changes, see my fork here for the latest code: > https://github.com/wspeirs/sop4j-dbutils/tree/dbutils-2.2 > <https://github.com/wspeirs/sop4j-dbutils/tree/dbutils-2.2> > > Happy to help, but it's been a long time since I have touched this code. > > Thanks! > > Bill- > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019, 1:43 AM Carl Hall <thecarlh...@apache.org > <mailto:thecarlh...@apache.org>> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> It’s been another couple of years since DbUtils had a release[1], and some >> good changes are ready to ship. Since the 1.7 release, we’ve had 90+ commit >> from Commons committers and GitHub PRs. Some features, a threading fix, and >> lots of attention to builds and quality across all platforms and >> functionality. >> >> I raise my hand to manage this release. Unless something pops up, I’ll get >> a vote out to review RC articles in a week or 2. All comments and questions >> welcome. >> >> There’s one breaking change by reducing access to a 7 yr old deprecated >> field, so the version should be a major bump. There’s an old RC1 artifact >> for a 2.0 release that wasn’t completed[2][3]. Should I jump to 3.0 or >> replace the 2.0 RC artifacts? >> >> Thanks, >> Carl >> >> 1 http://markmail.org/message/7nyhqkuw6cccqf7l < >> http://markmail.org/message/7nyhqkuw6cccqf7l >> <http://markmail.org/message/7nyhqkuw6cccqf7l>> >> 2 >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-dbutils.git;a=commit;h=83d65e39ce5ac4ad11f9cfc1294386936b0b2de2 >> >> <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-dbutils.git;a=commit;h=83d65e39ce5ac4ad11f9cfc1294386936b0b2de2> >> < >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-dbutils.git;a=commit;h=83d65e39ce5ac4ad11f9cfc1294386936b0b2de2 >> >> <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-dbutils.git;a=commit;h=83d65e39ce5ac4ad11f9cfc1294386936b0b2de2> >>> >> 3 >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-dbutils.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/DBUTILS_2_0_RC1 >> >> <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-dbutils.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/DBUTILS_2_0_RC1> >> < >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-dbutils.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/DBUTILS_2_0_RC1 >> >> <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-dbutils.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/DBUTILS_2_0_RC1>
