On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 17:05, Xeno Amess <[email protected]> wrote: > > I prefer 3.0-rc1
rc1 is release candidate 1; the suffix is dropped for the actual release artifacts. e.g. we vote on 3.0-beta1-rc1 but the release is called 3.0-beta1 > but 3.0-beta1 sounds far better than 3.0-B1 +1 > XenoAmess > > ________________________________ > From: Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 11:37:43 PM > To: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B". > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 16:49, Matt Juntunen > <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > +1 for "beta". > > +1 > > Gilles > > > > > -Matt > > ________________________________ > > From: Rob Tompkins <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 10:25 AM > > To: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B". > > > > I’m a +1 on “beta" over “B" > > > > It is indeed a good idea. > > > > > On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi All: > > > > > > I would like to update > > > https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html to > > > read: > > > > > > "Beta releases are denoted by adding "-beta<beta version number>" after > > > the > > > release number. For example, if the current release version is 2.0.4, and > > > a > > > developer wished to preview the next major release, the release would be > > > labeled 3.0-beta1" > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > Gary > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
