Le mer. 1 avr. 2020 à 14:33, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > On Apr 1, 2020, at 8:22 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On 2020-04-01, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > >> The docs should also make sure that release tags are in the form rel/... > >> which makes them read-only. > > > > So far I've created a new tag under rel/ for the RC tag when the vote > > has been accepted. So only "real" releases end up there. > > > > If we want to create all our tags there, things may look a bit > > confusing. But I could live with that as well. > > I would think we would only want to put tags that have a [VOTE] thread > associated under rel/ because they are required to remain in the public > domain.
A vote that *passed*, you mean (?). Everything that is not officially released is so-to-speak "internal". Is there any interest in having failed attempts made read-only? The "history" is kept through the ML archives (the "[Vote]" thread and its corresponding tag/commit). Gilles > I have, at times, found the need to delete a tag due to mistakes on my part. > But, I’ve only done so if there has been no email [VOTE]. If there was an > email [VOTE] in existence, then my move has been to increment the RC version. > > My 2 cents, > -Rob > > > > > Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
