> On Aug 16, 2020, at 8:29 AM, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sure. That’s why you’ve pulled me from a “no” to a non-blocking dissenting > opinion. I will go with community consensus at this point despite my opinion > (-0) (-; > > -Rob > >>> On Aug 16, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> @Rob Tompkins >> Hi. >> Please consider: >> 1. Most people who subscribe commons-dev have no right to do any operations >> to dependabot prs. >> We can not help merge them, nor decline them & close them. Means reading >> such mails are a waste of time. >> 2. Most people who subscribe commons-dev actually do not really want to read >> such e-mails. >> 3. Dependabot mails usually have low value. Only maintainers should have >> some interest in watching them. And usually it will not break >> anything.(Just, usually, in most cases). >> 4. Dependabot mails are flooding. They are too many. >> 5. Dependabot mails cause argues about them (this happened several times >> this two weeks). >> >> Well my idea is we create a new mailing list named "commons-dev-auto" or >> "commons-dev-bot", who contains all the auto-email. >> >> > I want the emails as bots should be treated as people in some sense. >> >> But the reality is the bot is not people.
Based on my readings about the theory of consciousness (See Annaka Harris’ book “Consciousness”), my feelings on the matter directly oppose yours here (agree to disagree). In fact I think that computers may actually have some self awareness. This may seem a tad loony and likely quite controversial. This is why I’m going to keep myself as non-blocking but dissenting as to keep my beliefs to myself and not impose upon the will of the community. :-) -Rob >> Besides, if there be such a people who make that much pr, will you promise >> review every of those prs, and do not complain about him be flooding? >> >> Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> 于2020年8月16日周日 下午8:02写道： >>> >>> >>> > On Aug 16, 2020, at 5:59 AM, Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > I REALLY suggest we move all dependabot mails to another mailing list. >>> > please create one. >>> >>> Your point has pulled me from a -1 to a -0, where I want the emails as bots >>> should be treated as people in some sense. That said, I’m curious as to >>> what others think... >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -Rob >>> >>> > >>> > Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> 于 2020年8月16日周日 下午5:55写道： >>> > >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> I am seeing an awful lot of list traffic generated for patch updates to >>> >> github actions e.g. updating from v1.4.0 to v1.4.1 >>> >> >>> >> Having read [1], my understanding is that we can specify v1 and that >>> >> will always point to the latest 1.x.x release. >>> >> >>> >> Would it not be better to specify v1 for these actions as that way: >>> >> - we use the latest version automatically (until 2.x.x is released) >>> >> - we avoid all the noise on the mailing list >>> >> >>> >> Mark >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> [1] https://docs.github.com/en/actions/creating-actions/about-actions >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>
