On 2021-07-01, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> That certainly doesn't prevent anybody else from trying to find a
>> compromise :-)
> It feels like Optionals could be a compromise.
I must admit I've lost track of the later discussion threads. If you
mean that we'd return Optional<> results, this would become an entirely
different API.
I'd very much like us to get to a compromise that helps our users and
doesn't force us to randomly fix RuntimeExceptions that slipped through
overly optimistic parser code.
So if you want to explore the Optionals idea further this would be
great, but I doubt enough people have seen it.
Thanks
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
