On Wed, Dec 29, 2021, 9:21 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 29/12/2021 15:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:37 AM Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Why not just run dependabot weekly. We move slowly enough that weekly
> >> currently works. Until we can get more hands on the project, slower
> comms
> >> are indeed reasonable…right?
> >>
> >
> > I would be OK with it once a week.
>
> I think the improvement resulting from moving to once a week will be
> minimal.
>
> I get the desire to keep things up to date but the way dependabot is
> currently working creates a lot of traffic on both issues@ and commits@
> That noise makes it much harder to follow any other activity that might
> be happening in the project. I am finding it a lot more effort to keep
> track of the Commons projects I am interested in.
>
> Most commons libraries have very few "real" dependencies. Most of the
> dependencies are there to support testing or building. I would argue
> that updates to test/build libraries are far less critical and low risk
> to update en masse just before a release.
>
> I may look at applying local filters in the short term but that strikes
> me very much as fixing the symptom rather than the cause and I don't
> think it is efficient for every subscriber to have to do this if there
> is an approach available that addresses the root cause.
>
> As an aside, we also need to keep repeatable builds in mind. Simply
> defining a version dependency as "latest" (or anything other than an
> explicit version) is going to be problematic.
>
> So, is there a way we could do something like the following with any
> combination of dependabot and/or Versions Maven plugin and/or something
> else?
>
> - dependabot like behaviour (daily check, separate PR) for dependencies
>    that are used (required or optional) at runtime
>
> - a weekly (or even monthly?) check for test libraries, build tools etc.
>    (i.e. everything that isn't a runtime dependency) that provides,
>    ideally, a single PR with one commit per update
>
> Emphasis on the "something like" the above.
>

To jump into the discussion, I think these are sensible and constructive
suggestions.

Matt

Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to