On Tue, Jun 23, 2026, 14:01 Piotr P. Karwasz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Gary, > > On 20.06.2026 16:53, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since the release of > > Apache Commons JEXL 3.6.2, so I would like to release Apache Commons > > JEXL 3.6.3. > > > > [...] > > > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now. > > > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > > [ ] +0 OK, but... > > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > [x] +0 OK, but should this be version 3.7.0? Hi Piotr, I argued for version 3.7.0 with Hen due to the addition of new APIs in keeping with semantic versioning, but he felt that 3.6.3 was thematically appropriate. In this specific case, I think it's OK. Gary > Checksums, signatures, unit tests and reproducibility is OK as usual, > but the JApiCmp shows: > > - A breaking change in jexl3.introspection (probably considered an > internal package) > - New methods in jexl3 and even a new type in jexl3.scripting. > > Piotr > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
