+0, both ways work for me, but if Commons has a rule about that let's follow it
Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: [email protected] w: http://redlink.co On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Peter Ansell <[email protected]> wrote: > I like @author tags in general, but have no qualms about moving them to > pom.xml. > > On 31 March 2015 at 00:34, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 30/03/15 11:50, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> at the Apache Commons project, we've decided to attribute authors of the > >> code in the developers section of pom.xml. While browsing the code, I > >> found > >> four classes with @author tag: > >> > >> - > >> > simple/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/simple/BlankNodeImplTest.java > >> - simple/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/simple/TypesTest.java > >> - > api/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/api/AbstractBlankNodeTest.java > >> - simple/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/simple/Types.java > >> > >> Would it be a problem for the Commons RDF community to move this > >> attributions to pom.xml? > > > > > > Not for me - attribution on specific files can put people off so I'm not > in > > favour of @author. > > > > The POM, or a separate file, is a good place to recognize contribution. > > > > Andy > > > >> > >> Thank you! > >> Benedikt > >> > > >
