On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Using 0.1.0 style version also on the commons-rdf-api would probably
> simplify a lot for the release plugin.. specially when/if we were to
> try to do the equivalent of a 0.1.1 release of commons-rdf-simple. It
> would also be more in line with semantic versioning to always have 3
> digits - even if we don't intend to publish a .1 patch of the -api.
> (Any .1 patch of the API would be just textual formatting changes of
> javadoc?)
>


+1 to that idea, I've just implemented in commit
4731519ed6104be1ace423a6198b0d60468d32b3


> I guess you would bump master to be on 0.1.1-SNAPSHOT afterwards, or
> are you setting them to 0.2-SNAPSHOT and 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT?


I'd prefer to focus on the api evolution, so master will be 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT,
while I plan to keep a maintenance branch for 0.1.x. But I happy to listen
opinions about this.

-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: [email protected]
w: http://redlink.co

Reply via email to