[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14533011#comment-14533011
]
Stian Soiland-Reyes commented on COMMONSRDF-20:
-----------------------------------------------
I don't think those are limitations that prevents basic usage, it just prevents
advanced and more controlled usage - which might be out of scope for
ServiceLoader anyway.
Then perhaps we can still merge your PR as a proof of concept, but not to
document it within the -api of RDFTermFactory as a contract before we can
solidify exactly how it could be applied (or not) for the more complex
scenarios?
> Provide a mechanism for allowing the load of different RDF Term Factories
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COMMONSRDF-20
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-20
> Project: Apache Commons RDF
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 0.1
> Reporter: Sergio Fernández
> Fix For: 0.2
>
>
> Benedikt has asked this questions in the mailing list:
> http://markmail.org/message/az4jb744zfct2uq5
> What [we currently
> have|http://commonsrdf.incubator.apache.org/userguide.html#Creating_Commons_RDF_instances]
> remains valid, but would be great to make easier the life of people.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
