On 15 September 2016 at 12:06, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> wrote:
> [[ Cross-posting - let's try to reply to dev@commons. ]]
> b) Move RDFParserBuilder to package org.apache.commonsrdf.experimental
> or similar (allowing us to fully change it for the next version)
> c) Same as b) - but also move RDFParserBuilder implementations to e.g.
> org.apache.commonsrdf.jena.experimental
> e) Remove RDFParserBuilder.rdfTermFactory()
These are my proposed changes - I'll go ahead on these unless I hear
otherwise :)
Commons folks - is the use of a ".experimental" sub-package (and
appropriate Javadoc) OK?
Suggested javadoc:
package org.commons.rdf.api.experimental;
/**
* ...
* <p>
* NOTE: This interface/class is currently marked as
<strong>experimental</strong>,
* meaning that it might change or be removed in the next minor version.
*/
public interface RDFParserBuilder {
// ...
}
I'm not proposing we go all Guava style with lots of experimental
annotations (and the well known incompatibility issues following),
just for this 0.3.0-incubating version - so we can decide later on the
final form of that interface for the following (hopefully 1.0.0)
version under Commons proper.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
