Sorry, I'm some what unclear as to the vetting procedure, it doesn't seem to be documented anywhere. Also, aside from our subscription being accepted to code-awards@, is the list of accepted mentors documented anywhere?
Thanks, Mehdi On 18 March 2012 07:31, Ulrich Stärk <u...@spielviel.de> wrote: > I'm OK with that, I'm just recapitulating what we discussed after last year's > incident. Assuming > lazy concensus. we'll invite pmc@a.o to begin applying as mentors in 72 > hours, no changes to the > mentor vetting procedure. > > Uli > > On 18.03.2012 04:59, Sagara Gunathunga wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Tammo van Lessen <tvanles...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi Ulrich, >>>> >>>> I applied as mentor for Apache ODE and I'm the PMC chair of ODE. Does >>>> that mean I have to ACK (or not NACK) myself? Or do I need to let the >>>> others PMC members vote for me mentoring a project? Sounds a bit >>>> cumbersome to me. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Tammo >>>> >>> I agree with Tammo. The old process has been working ok for several >>> years (with the exception of one incident last year). I'd rather >>> continue with the process (and maybe avoid any temporary account >>> creation at apache)., and deal with issues when we find them. Anyway, >>> just my 0.2c... >> +1 In my POV better to continue with old process and address any >> issues once they occur. >> >> Thanks ! >>> >>> -- >>> Luciano Resende >>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> >>
